HiveBrain v1.2.0
Get Started
← Back to all entries
patterncsharpCritical

Why is there no ForEach extension method on IEnumerable?

Submitted by: @import:stackoverflow-api··
0
Viewed 0 times
extensionwhymethodienumerableforeachthere

Problem

Inspired by another question asking about the missing Zip function:

Why is there no ForEach extension method on the IEnumerable interface? Or anywhere? The only class that gets a ForEach method is List<>. Is there a reason why it's missing, maybe performance?

Solution

There is already a foreach statement included in the language that does the job most of the time.

I'd hate to see the following:

list.ForEach( item =>
{
    item.DoSomething();
} );


Instead of:

foreach(Item item in list)
{
     item.DoSomething();
}


The latter is clearer and easier to read in most situations, although maybe a bit longer to type.

However, I must admit I changed my stance on that issue; a ForEach() extension method would indeed be useful in some situations.

Here are the major differences between the statement and the method:

  • Type checking: foreach is done at runtime, ForEach() is at compile time (Big Plus!)



  • The syntax to call a delegate is indeed much simpler: objects.ForEach(DoSomething);



  • ForEach() could be chained: although evilness/usefulness of such a feature is open to discussion.



Those are all great points made by many people here and I can see why people are missing the function. I wouldn't mind Microsoft adding a standard ForEach method in the next framework iteration.

Code Snippets

list.ForEach( item =>
{
    item.DoSomething();
} );
foreach(Item item in list)
{
     item.DoSomething();
}

Context

Stack Overflow Q#101265, score: 236

Revisions (0)

No revisions yet.