snippetcppCritical
How do I call ::std::make_shared on a class with only protected or private constructors?
Viewed 0 times
privatewithhowclassprotectedstdonlymake_sharedcallconstructors
Problem
I have this code that doesn't work, but I think the intent is clear:
testmakeshared.cpp
But I get this error when I compile it:
```
g++ -std=c++0x -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -Wall testmakeshared.cpp
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:52:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/memory:86,
from testmakeshared.cpp:1:
testmakeshared.cpp: In constructor ‘std::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace(_Alloc) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:518:8: instantiated from ‘std::__shared_count::__shared_count(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, _Tp*, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator, _Args = {}, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:986:35: instantiated from ‘std::__shared_ptr::__shared_ptr(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Alloc = std::allocator, _Args = {}, _Tp = A, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:313:64: instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr::shared_ptr(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Alloc = std::allocator, _Args = {}, _Tp = A]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:531:39: instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr std::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _
testmakeshared.cpp
#include
class A {
public:
static ::std::shared_ptr create() {
return ::std::make_shared();
}
protected:
A() {}
A(const A &) = delete;
const A &operator =(const A &) = delete;
};
::std::shared_ptr foo()
{
return A::create();
}But I get this error when I compile it:
```
g++ -std=c++0x -march=native -mtune=native -O3 -Wall testmakeshared.cpp
In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:52:0,
from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/memory:86,
from testmakeshared.cpp:1:
testmakeshared.cpp: In constructor ‘std::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace(_Alloc) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:518:8: instantiated from ‘std::__shared_count::__shared_count(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, _Tp*, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Tp = A, _Alloc = std::allocator, _Args = {}, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:986:35: instantiated from ‘std::__shared_ptr::__shared_ptr(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Alloc = std::allocator, _Args = {}, _Tp = A, __gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy _Lp = (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2u]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:313:64: instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr::shared_ptr(std::_Sp_make_shared_tag, const _Alloc&, _Args&& ...) [with _Alloc = std::allocator, _Args = {}, _Tp = A]’
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.1/../../../../include/c++/4.6.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:531:39: instantiated from ‘std::shared_ptr std::allocate_shared(const _Alloc&, _
Solution
This answer is probably better, and the one I'll likely accept. But I also came up with a method that's uglier, but does still let everything still be inline and doesn't require a derived class:
Edit 2017-01-06: I changed this to make it clear that this idea is clearly and simply extensible to constructors that take arguments because other people were providing answers along those lines and seemed confused about this.
#include
#include
class A {
protected:
struct this_is_private;
public:
explicit A(const this_is_private &) {}
A(const this_is_private &, ::std::string, int) {}
template
static ::std::shared_ptr create(T &&...args) {
return ::std::make_shared(this_is_private{0},
::std::forward(args)...);
}
protected:
struct this_is_private {
explicit this_is_private(int) {}
};
A(const A &) = delete;
const A &operator =(const A &) = delete;
};
::std::shared_ptr foo()
{
return A::create();
}
::std::shared_ptr bar()
{
return A::create("George", 5);
}
::std::shared_ptr errors()
{
::std::shared_ptr retval;
// Each of these assignments to retval properly generates errors.
retval = A::create("George");
retval = new A(A::this_is_private{0});
return ::std::move(retval);
}Edit 2017-01-06: I changed this to make it clear that this idea is clearly and simply extensible to constructors that take arguments because other people were providing answers along those lines and seemed confused about this.
Code Snippets
#include <memory>
#include <string>
class A {
protected:
struct this_is_private;
public:
explicit A(const this_is_private &) {}
A(const this_is_private &, ::std::string, int) {}
template <typename... T>
static ::std::shared_ptr<A> create(T &&...args) {
return ::std::make_shared<A>(this_is_private{0},
::std::forward<T>(args)...);
}
protected:
struct this_is_private {
explicit this_is_private(int) {}
};
A(const A &) = delete;
const A &operator =(const A &) = delete;
};
::std::shared_ptr<A> foo()
{
return A::create();
}
::std::shared_ptr<A> bar()
{
return A::create("George", 5);
}
::std::shared_ptr<A> errors()
{
::std::shared_ptr<A> retval;
// Each of these assignments to retval properly generates errors.
retval = A::create("George");
retval = new A(A::this_is_private{0});
return ::std::move(retval);
}Context
Stack Overflow Q#8147027, score: 145
Revisions (0)
No revisions yet.