patternModerate
Git merge vs rebase — when to use which
Viewed 0 times
merge vs rebaselinear historyno-ffsquash mergeforce pushshared branch
Problem
Team debates merge vs rebase. Inconsistent approach leads to messy history and painful conflicts.
Solution
Rules: (1) Rebase YOUR local branch onto main before merging — linear history. (2) Never rebase shared branches — rewrites history. (3) Merge for integrating features: git merge --no-ff feature. (4) Rebase for updating feature branch with main. (5) Squash merge for small features. (6) For releases: always merge. Golden rule: rebase local, merge shared.
Why
Rebase rewrites history by creating new commits with different parents. Clean for local but destructive for shared branches. Merge preserves all original commits.
Revisions (0)
No revisions yet.