patternMinor
Bin packing problem or not?
Viewed 0 times
problemnotpackingbin
Problem
Suppose I have $N$ bins and $M$ items as depicted in the figure below (3 bins and 3 items):
Suppose that every bin has unit capacity and the weights of the items depend on the bins used. I want to maximize the number of items in the bins subject to:
Finally, I have the following problem:
Maximize $\sum\limits_{i=1}^{M}\sum\limits_{j=1}^{N}x_{ij}$
subject to
-
$\frac{g_{ij}x_{ij}}{\sum\limits_{i^\prime=1,\;i^\prime \neq i}^{M}\sum\limits_{j^\prime=1,\;j^\prime \neq j}^{N}g_{ij^\prime}x_{i^\prime j^\prime}}\geq x_{ij},\; \forall i, j,$ (C1)
-
$\sum\limits_{j=1}^{N}x_{ij}\leq1,\; \forall i,$ (C2)
-
$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{M}x_{ij}\leq1,\; \forall j,$ (C3)
and $x_{ij}\in\{0, 1\},\; \forall i, j,$ (C4)
The input of the problem is $M$, $N$, and $g_{ij},\;\forall i,j$. The right hand side of constraint (C1) is to say that when item $i$ is n
Suppose that every bin has unit capacity and the weights of the items depend on the bins used. I want to maximize the number of items in the bins subject to:
- One bin contains at most one item.
- If item $i$ is on bin $j$ then $g_{ij}\geq1$ must hold now if all other bins are empty.
- If item $i$ is on bin $j$ (so $g_{ij}\geq1$ must hold now) and item $i^\prime$ is on bin $j^\prime$, then $g_{ij}\geq g_{ij^\prime}$ and $g_{i^\prime j^\prime}\geq g_{i^\prime j}$ must both hold now.
- If item $i$ is on bin $j$ (so $g_{ij}\geq1$ must hold now) and item $i^\prime$ is on bin $j^\prime$ (so $g_{ij}\geq g_{ij^\prime}$ and $g_{i^\prime j^\prime}\geq g_{i^\prime j}$ must both hold now) and item $i^{\prime\prime}$ is on bin $j^{\prime\prime}$, then $g_{ij}\geq g_{ij^\prime}+g_{ij^{\prime\prime}}$ and $g_{i^\prime j^\prime}\geq g_{i^\prime j}+g_{i^\prime j^{\prime\prime}}$ and $g_{i^{\prime\prime} j^{\prime\prime}}\geq g_{i^{\prime\prime} j}+g_{i^{\prime\prime} j^{\prime}}$ must all hold now.
- And so on and so forth.
- In general I will have the following constraint: $g_{ij}x_{ij}\geq\sum\limits_{i^\prime=1,\;i^\prime \neq i}^{M}\sum\limits_{j^\prime=1,\;j^\prime \neq j}^{N}g_{ij^\prime}x_{i^\prime j^\prime}$, where $x_{ij}$ equals $1$ if item $i$ is in bin $j$ and equals $0$ otherwise.
Finally, I have the following problem:
Maximize $\sum\limits_{i=1}^{M}\sum\limits_{j=1}^{N}x_{ij}$
subject to
-
$\frac{g_{ij}x_{ij}}{\sum\limits_{i^\prime=1,\;i^\prime \neq i}^{M}\sum\limits_{j^\prime=1,\;j^\prime \neq j}^{N}g_{ij^\prime}x_{i^\prime j^\prime}}\geq x_{ij},\; \forall i, j,$ (C1)
-
$\sum\limits_{j=1}^{N}x_{ij}\leq1,\; \forall i,$ (C2)
-
$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{M}x_{ij}\leq1,\; \forall j,$ (C3)
and $x_{ij}\in\{0, 1\},\; \forall i, j,$ (C4)
The input of the problem is $M$, $N$, and $g_{ij},\;\forall i,j$. The right hand side of constraint (C1) is to say that when item $i$ is n
Solution
You can't simply say: "This is a bin packing problem and therefore NP-hard."
Consider the problem of $N$ unit bins and $M$ unit items with the target of maximizing the usage of the bins. Clearly this is also a bin packing problem, but it is not NP-hard.
However, you can reduce to the decision variant of your problem from partition:
Given a set of items with sizes $a_1, \dotsc, a_k$, can it be partitioned into two subsets of equal size.
Given items $a_1, \dotsc, a_k$, we construct an instance of your problem as follows:
A-a_l & A_{l-1}2A,~ i\neq j\\
\frac A2 & i=j>2A\\
0 & i=2A+1,~ j\leq A\\
0 & i=2A+2,~ A
The construction works as follows:
Consider the problem of $N$ unit bins and $M$ unit items with the target of maximizing the usage of the bins. Clearly this is also a bin packing problem, but it is not NP-hard.
However, you can reduce to the decision variant of your problem from partition:
Given a set of items with sizes $a_1, \dotsc, a_k$, can it be partitioned into two subsets of equal size.
Given items $a_1, \dotsc, a_k$, we construct an instance of your problem as follows:
- Let $A_i = \sum_{j=1}^i a_j$ amd $A=A_k$.
- We introduce $2A+2$ items and $2A+2$ bins.
- $g_{i,j} = \begin{cases}
A-a_l & A_{l-1}2A,~ i\neq j\\
\frac A2 & i=j>2A\\
0 & i=2A+1,~ j\leq A\\
0 & i=2A+2,~ A
- We ask for an assignment with $\sum_{i=1}^{A}\sum_{j=1}^{A} x_{i,j} \geq A+2$.
The construction works as follows:
- Any solution will satisfy $x_{i,j}=1 \Rightarrow i=j$.
- Items/bins $i$ with $A_{l-1}
- The threshold can only be reached, if the last two items are placed, ensuring that the partition is into two sets of size $\frac A2$.
Context
StackExchange Computer Science Q#22136, answer score: 9
Revisions (0)
No revisions yet.