debugsqlMinor
Postgres cannot simulate table with a view: column must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
Viewed 0 times
cannotthepostgrescolumnwithmustgroupusedaggregateview
Problem
I am trying to replace a table in our application by using a View. It works well for the most part, but I can't get past this error: "column must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function"
Steps to reproduce:
Now this query works fine:
But an identical query from the view fails:
It would be pretty hard to rewrite the application layer (since Django is generating the queries and it likes to use
Steps to reproduce:
CREATE TABLE example_t (
did serial PRIMARY KEY,
a text,
b text
);
INSERT INTO example_t(a, b) VALUES ('a', 'b');
CREATE VIEW example_t_v AS
SELECT t.did as did, t.a as a, t.b as b
FROM example_t t;Now this query works fine:
SELECT t.a, t.b FROM example_t t GROUP BY (t.did);But an identical query from the view fails:
SELECT t.a, t.b FROM example_t_v t GROUP BY (t.did);
ERROR: column "t.a" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
LINE 1: SELECT t.a, t.b FROM example_t_v t GROUP BY (t.did);It would be pretty hard to rewrite the application layer (since Django is generating the queries and it likes to use
GROUP BY a lot) so is there a solution on the db layer?Solution
Postgres is smart enough to know in the
However, Postgres does NOT know that the group-by column in the
FYI - your query makes no sense. Why would you group by a column when you apparently have no interest in performing an aggregate? What would you expect a and b to give you?
TABLE that your group-by column is UNIQUE (PRIMARY KEY) ... grouping by a column that is UNIQUE is pointless, so postgres just gives you back what you ask for (column values a and b)..However, Postgres does NOT know that the group-by column in the
VIEW is UNIQUE.. Thus, it's confused by your query (as well as most humans would be confused by your query - including myself).FYI - your query makes no sense. Why would you group by a column when you apparently have no interest in performing an aggregate? What would you expect a and b to give you?
Context
StackExchange Database Administrators Q#182987, answer score: 8
Revisions (0)
No revisions yet.