patternsqlMinor
Advice on diagnosing a "sometimes" slow query
Viewed 0 times
sometimesqueryslowadvicediagnosing
Problem
I have a stored procedure which returns results from an indexed view via a covering index. Usually, it runs fast (~10ms), sometimes it can run up to 8 seconds.
Here's an example random execution (note: this isn't a slow one, but the query text is the same apart from the value passed through):
Here's the SPROC:
(note: i added the
Here's the covering index (note: the view also has a clustered index on
I put a profiler trace on, with showplan XML statistics.
Here's a slow one (6 seconds), and the relevant plan:
Looks exactly as i'd expect, and is the same plan when the query is fast.
Here's the zoom in on the costly part of the plan, if that helps:
Here is the full schema of the view/backing tables, if that helps: https://pastebin.com/wh1sRcbQ
Notes:
Here's an example random execution (note: this isn't a slow one, but the query text is the same apart from the value passed through):
declare @p2 dbo.IdentityType
insert into @p2 values(5710955)
insert into @p2 values(5710896)
insert into @p2 values(5710678)
insert into @p2 values(5710871)
insert into @p2 values(5711103)
insert into @p2 values(6215197)
insert into @p2 values(5710780)
exec ListingSearch_ByLocationAndStatus @statusType=1,@locationIds=@p2Here's the SPROC:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ListingSearch_ByLocationAndStatus]
@LocationIds IdentityType READONLY,
@StatusType TINYINT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
SELECT -- lots of fields
FROM [dbo].[ListingSearchView][a] WITH (NOEXPAND)
INNER JOIN @LocationIds [b] ON [a].[LocationId] = [b].[Id]
WHERE [a].[StatusType] = @statusType
OPTION (RECOMPILE);(note: i added the
OPTION (RECOMPILE) hint recently after some advice, but it hasn't helped.Here's the covering index (note: the view also has a clustered index on
ListingId, which is unique)CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_ListingSearchView_ForAPI] ON [dbo].[ListingSearchView]
(
[LocationId] ASC,
[StatusType] ASC
)
INCLUDE ( -- all the fields in the query) WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON)
GOI put a profiler trace on, with showplan XML statistics.
Here's a slow one (6 seconds), and the relevant plan:
Looks exactly as i'd expect, and is the same plan when the query is fast.
Here's the zoom in on the costly part of the plan, if that helps:
Here is the full schema of the view/backing tables, if that helps: https://pastebin.com/wh1sRcbQ
Notes:
- Indexes have been defrag'd, statistics up to date.
- Orig
Solution
I really don't think using the
Parameter sniffing happens when SQL is confused about a particular query and thinks its new because it sees new parameters. It's slow because it's taking extra time to generate a new execution plan.
All that option does is force SQL to produce a new plan every time which is pretty much the same thing. Instead, you might want to consider adding default parameters using this hint:
When choosing parameters for the default make sure to use a statistically representative set.
That will force the same plan to be used every time and eliminate the possibility of parameter sniffing. Once you do that, and determine it didn't help, then its probably safe to dismiss parameter sniffing as a possibility.
OPTION (RECOMPILE) is an effective way to eliminate the possibility of parameter sniffing.Parameter sniffing happens when SQL is confused about a particular query and thinks its new because it sees new parameters. It's slow because it's taking extra time to generate a new execution plan.
All that option does is force SQL to produce a new plan every time which is pretty much the same thing. Instead, you might want to consider adding default parameters using this hint:
OPTION(OPTIMIZE FOR(@LocationIds='xx',@StatusType='xx'))When choosing parameters for the default make sure to use a statistically representative set.
That will force the same plan to be used every time and eliminate the possibility of parameter sniffing. Once you do that, and determine it didn't help, then its probably safe to dismiss parameter sniffing as a possibility.
Code Snippets
OPTION(OPTIMIZE FOR(@LocationIds='xx',@StatusType='xx'))Context
StackExchange Database Administrators Q#185054, answer score: 2
Revisions (0)
No revisions yet.