Is saving disk space still considered an advantage of normalization?

I have read a while back that one of the advantages of normalization is to save disk space (since normalization minimizes redundancy), but is saving disk space still considered an advantage of normalization in current time where disk storage is very cheap?

Normalization was never about saving disk space. In his 1971 normalization paper E.F.Codd wrote: "It is important to remember that we are not making a case for or against any physical storage structures in this paper"[1] (emphasis in the original).

Normalization is all about the best logical representation for data and by no means implies that a normalized database will take up less space than a denormalized one.

Given the range of advances in database storage techniques since then (e.g. compressed formats, join indexes, columnar storage) there is probably even less correlation between normalization and storage size today than there was 50 years ago.

[1] Normalized Data Base Structure: A Brief Tutorial

StackExchange Database Administrators Q#228645, answer score: 7