FizzBuzz implementation

The common FizzBuzz implementation I saw is using a check for % 15 for printing "FizzBuzz"

Would you let me know if there is anything wrong / better with this approach?

public class FizzBuzz {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
            boolean fizzOrBuzz = false;
            if (i % 3 == 0) {
                System.out.print("Fizz");
                fizzOrBuzz = true;
            }
            if (i % 5 == 0) {
                System.out.print("Buzz");
                fizzOrBuzz = true;
            }

            if (fizzOrBuzz) {
                System.out.println();
            } else {
                System.out.println(String.valueOf(i));
            }
        }
    }
}

Let's compare your version to the % 15 version:

public class FizzBuzz {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        for (int i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
            if (i % 15 == 0) {
                System.out.println("FizzBuzz")
            } else if (i % 3 == 0) {
                System.out.println("Fizz");
            } else if (i % 5 == 0) {
                System.out.println("Buzz");
            } else {
                System.out.println(String.valueOf(i));
            }
        }
    }
}

The % 15 version is simpler and easier to read. This version neatly delineates the problem into the 4 different cases, and handles each case. In contrast, your version introduces a boolean logic flag (which I consider to be a significant anti-pattern) and a not entirely intuitive dependence on the order of the if statements.

StackExchange Code Review Q#11489, answer score: 29