Bresenham-like line algorithm

I implemented an algorithm that gives me a list of points that should be drawn in order the get a line between two points. Please note: it works only in a coordinate system whose origin (0,0) is in the upper left corner.

I'd like to get some review on my Haskell code, could it be improved in terms of the language constructs used?
Could it be more readable, more straight forward?

module DrawLine where

data Point = Point Float Float deriving (Show)

getRange :: Int -> Int -> [Int]
getRange a b
    | a  Point -> Float
getSlope (Point x1 y1) (Point x2 y2) = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

{-|
 - Get a list of points where pixels should be filled to draw a line
 - (Inspired from Bresenham's line algorithm)
 - Takes two Point arguments representing the end points of the line, the points
 - will be located on a line between these two points
 -}
getLinePoints :: Point -> Point -> [Point]
getLinePoints f@(Point fx fy) l@(Point lx ly)
    -- vertical line
    | fx == lx = [(Point fx (fromIntegral y)) | y  1.0 || m 
                    (Point
                        ((1/m) * ((fromIntegral y) - fy) + fx)
                        (fromIntegral y)
                    )
                )
                (getRange (round fy) (round ly))
        else
            map (\x ->
                    (Point
                        (fromIntegral x)
                        (m * ((fromIntegral x) - fx) + fy)
                    )
                )
                (getRange (round fx) (round lx))
        where
            m = getSlope f l

Thoughts.

Define a Line type and rename getLinePoints to mkLine. A list of points may represent anything but a Line [Points] implies the Points within the line. Where possible let the type system work for you. Of course you could get cute and have Line (m -> x -> b -> [Points]) or List Point Point.

You could define Eq and Ord instances for the Point and maybe Line types.

What if getSlope is passed a vertical line? Should it perhaps use Maybe?

I'd move the non-vertical line support into its own function. Perhaps add a horizontal line function as well.

Why use a list comprehension for the vertical one and map for the other type of line? It can all be done with a comprehension.

StackExchange Code Review Q#38358, answer score: 2