Proper naming for a Time class

Which of these names is better: time.getHours() or time.hours()? And why?

public class Time implements Serializable {
    private final int hours;
    private final int minutes;

    public static Time from(Calendar calendar) {
        int hoursIn24HourFormat = calendar.get(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY);
        int minutes = calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE);
        return new Time(hoursIn24HourFormat, minutes);
    }

    public Time(int hours, int minutes) {
        this.hours = hours;
        this.minutes = minutes;
    }

    // or may be getHours() name is better?
    public int hours() {
        return hours;
    }

    // or may be getMinutes() name is better?
    public int minutes() {
        return minutes;
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(Object obj) {
        if (obj == null) {
            return false;
        }
        if (obj == this) {
            return true;
        }
        if (!(obj instanceof Time)) {
            return false;
        }
        Time other = (Time) obj;
        return (hours == other.hours) &&
               (minutes == other.minutes);
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
        return toMinutesOfDay();
    }

    private int toMinutesOfDay() {
        return hours * 60 + minutes;
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
        return twoDigitString(hours) + ":" + twoDigitString(minutes);
    }

    private static String twoDigitString(int timeComponent) {
        return (timeComponent  time.toMinutesOfDay();
    }

    public boolean within(Time fromIncluded, Time toIncluded) {
        return (!fromIncluded.after(this)) && (!this.after(toIncluded));
    }
}

It is a matter of taste, so there is no 'better'. But more common seams to be time.getHours(); because often the conventions of JavaBean are used.

If you work in a team, I would discuss the naming conventions to use with them.

StackExchange Code Review Q#39444, answer score: 4