patternpythonMinor
Speeding up Project Euler 43 - sub-string divisibility
Viewed 0 times
subprojectdivisibilityeulerspeedingstring
Problem
The number, 1406357289, is a 0 to 9 pandigital number because it is
made up of each of the digits 0 to 9 in some order, but it also has a
rather interesting sub-string divisibility property.
Let d1 be the 1st digit, d2 be the 2nd digit, and so on. In this way,
we note the following:
Find the sum of all 0 to 9 pandigital numbers with this property.
Project Euler 43
made up of each of the digits 0 to 9 in some order, but it also has a
rather interesting sub-string divisibility property.
Let d1 be the 1st digit, d2 be the 2nd digit, and so on. In this way,
we note the following:
- d2d3d4=406 is divisible by 2
- d3d4d5=063 is divisible by 3
- d4d5d6=635 is divisible by 5
- d5d6d7=357 is divisible by 7
- d6d7d8=572 is divisible by 11
- d7d8d9=728 is divisible by 13
- d8d9d10=289 is divisible by 17
Find the sum of all 0 to 9 pandigital numbers with this property.
Project Euler 43
from itertools import permutations
from primes import primes_upto
from collections import Counter
from timeit import default_timer as timer
start = timer()
def follows_property(n):
divisors = primes_upto(17)
for k in range(7):
if int(n[k:(k+3)]) % divisors[k] != 0:
return False
return True
ans = 0
digits = Counter(range(10))
start = timer()
for combo in permutations(range(10), 9):
num = ''.join([str(x) for x in list(combo)])
if follows_property(num):
missing = int(list((digits - Counter(sorted([int(k) for k in str(num)]))).elements())[0])
num = int(num)
ans += int("%d%d" % (missing, num))
elapsed_time = (timer() - start) * 1000 # s --> ms
print "Found %d in %r ms." % (ans, elapsed_time)Solution
You can make a few quick improvements without altering the algorithm significantly:
-
Remove one of the redundant calls to
-
Store the list of primes instead of calculating it for every call to
-
Convert the digits to strings in the list passed to
-
Run through all permutations instead of 9-tuples and remove the
These are minor changes, but they clean up the code a bit. I also renamed
-
Remove one of the redundant calls to
timer().-
Store the list of primes instead of calculating it for every call to
follows_property.-
Convert the digits to strings in the list passed to
permutations so you can simplify the calculation of num.-
Run through all permutations instead of 9-tuples and remove the
Counter and missing parts.These are minor changes, but they clean up the code a bit. I also renamed
ans to sum to clarify what it holds. They also cut the running time by more than half.from itertools import permutations
from primes import primes_upto
from collections import Counter
from timeit import default_timer as timer
divisors = primes_upto(17)
def follows_property(n):
for k in range(7):
if int(n[k+1:(k+4)]) % divisors[k] != 0:
return False
return True
sum = 0
start = timer()
for combo in permutations([str(x) for x in range(10)]):
num = ''.join(combo)
if follows_property(num):
sum += int(num)
elapsed_time = (timer() - start) * 1000 # s --> ms
print("Found %d in %r ms." % (sum, elapsed_time))Code Snippets
from itertools import permutations
from primes import primes_upto
from collections import Counter
from timeit import default_timer as timer
divisors = primes_upto(17)
def follows_property(n):
for k in range(7):
if int(n[k+1:(k+4)]) % divisors[k] != 0:
return False
return True
sum = 0
start = timer()
for combo in permutations([str(x) for x in range(10)]):
num = ''.join(combo)
if follows_property(num):
sum += int(num)
elapsed_time = (timer() - start) * 1000 # s --> ms
print("Found %d in %r ms." % (sum, elapsed_time))Context
StackExchange Code Review Q#50965, answer score: 5
Revisions (0)
No revisions yet.