Loading dictionary using trie in C very slow with large data set

The code below works for very small dictionary files I used to test (two words). However when I run this using a more typical dictionary file, my machine slows to the point of near crash. I would like a review of what the potential bottleneck may be which I believe to be in the load() function. Of course, general comments are also welcomed if they may help with optimization and overall performance.

```
typedef struct node

{
bool is_word;
struct node* children[27];
}
node;

node* root;

int nwords = 0;

/**
* Returns true if word is in dictionary else false.
*/

bool check(const char* word)
{
node* current = root;

int i = 0;

while(word[i] != '\0')
{
int letter = tolower(word[i]);

if (letter == '\'')
{
return false;
}

if (current->children[letter-'a'] != NULL)
{
current = current->children[letter-'a'];
i++;
}

else
{
return false;
}
}

if (current->is_word == true)
{
return true;

}

return false;
}

/**
* Loads dictionary into memory. Returns true if successful else false.
*/

bool load(const char* dictionary)
{

FILE* dict = fopen(dictionary, "r");

if(dict == false)
{
return false;
}

//initialize nodes

root = calloc(27,sizeof(node));
node* current = NULL;

int c = 0;

while(fgetc(dict) != EOF)
{
fseek(dict, -1, SEEK_CUR); //go back one byte to beginning of word
current = root; //set index to root

for(c = fgetc(dict); c != '\n'; c = fgetc(dict)) //iterate through word
{
if(current->children[c-'a'] == NULL)
{
current->children[c-'a'] = calloc(27,sizeof(node));
current = current->children[c-'a'];
}
else
{
current = current->children[c-'a'];
}
}
current->i

A few notes:

-
typedef struct names are commonly written in PascalCase today.

Node* current = NULL;

-
Initialize your variables on the lowest scope as possible. Therefore, declare your variables within your for loops. (C99)

for(int c = fgetc(dict); c != '\n'; c = fgetc(dict)) //iterate through word

Also, I feel as if you should be checking c for EOF, and then check for \n within the for loop.

-
The statements inside of your for loop look fishy to me:

if(current->children[c-'a'] == NULL)
{
    current->children[c-'a'] = calloc(27,sizeof(node))
    current = current->children[c-'a'];
}
else
{                
    current = current->children[c-'a'];
}

No matter what, you are going to set children equal to current->children[c-'a'], so you can move that statement out of both branches of the conditional (DRY). Also, you should not be allocating 27 elements for every single Node. Here is how I would write it:

if (!current->children[c-'a']) current->children[c-'a'] = calloc(1, sizeof(node));
current = current->children[c-'a'];

-
You can remove the != NULL part in your if conditional statements.

-
Avoid global variables: root and nwords.

-
Avoid magic numbers.

for (int i = 0; i < 27; i++)

Use a #define instead at the top of your code.

#define NUM_NODES 27

But where does the number 27 even come from? Documentation would go a long way here to help developers understand what it is.

-
Set your Node values to NULL after you free them. This is so that you do not try to access the data again after it has been freed.

StackExchange Code Review Q#58699, answer score: 8