Makefile for C++ OpenGL with GLFW and glad

This is a makefile I wrote to compile a simple OpenGL test project which is going to use the libraries GLFW and the C library glad.c.

CC = gcc
CXX = g++

COMPILE_FLAGS = -Wall -ggdb -O3
LINK_FLAGS = -lglfw3 -lopengl32 -lglu32 -lgdi32

glfw = d:/external/glfw-3.1
glfw_inc = $(glfw)/include
glfw_lib = $(glfw)/lib64

glad = d:/external/glad-c
glad_inc = $(glad)/include

INCLUDES = -I$(glfw_inc) -I$(glad_inc)
LIBRARIES = -L$(glfw_lib)

cpp_files = main.cpp
objects = $(cpp_files:.cpp=.o)
headers =

all: main.exe

main.exe: $(objects) glad.o
        $(CXX) $(LIBRARIES) -o main.exe $(objects) glad.o $(LINK_FLAGS)

$(objects): %.o: %.cpp $(headers) makefile
        $(CXX) $(COMPILE_FLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -c -o $@ %%CODEBLOCK_0%%lt;

glad.o: glad.c
        $(CC) $(COMPILE_FLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -c -o glad.o glad.c

Since this is basically the first makefile I wrote, I could surely use some criticism as to what is good style and what isn't. I also wonder if there is a more elegant way to handle the fact that glad is actually a C library and has to be compiled with gcc instead of g++, but g++ is used for everything else.

First of all, good for you for learning how to write a proper makefile. Few people are any good at it, and it's a really fundamental tool. Even when nice tools such as CMake are used, it's very useful to understand how to write one from scratch.

With that said, here are some things that may help you improve your makefile:

Prefer Makefile to makefile

The names are equivalent, but since you're using GNU Make, you may as well follow its conventions, and one convention is to name it Makefile instead of makefile. Either will work, but quoting from the GNU Make man page:


We recommend 'Makefile' because it appears prominently near the beginning of a directory listing, right near other important files such as 'README'.

Use standard variable names

There are standard names for some of the variables you're using. For example, use CFLAGS instead of COMPILE_FLAGS and CXXFLAGS which is the same thing, but for invocations of g++ (or more accurately invocations of $(CXX)). Similarly, use LDFLAGS instead of LINK_FLAGS.

Add INCLUDES to CFLAGS

It's good practice to use variables like INCLUDES to keep things tidy, but it would be better if you added that to CFLAGS:

CFLAGS += $(INCLUDES)

The reason for doing that is in the next point.

Use the implicit rules

GNU Make already has an implicit rule for creating .o files from .c files. That rule looks like this:

%.o : %.c
         $(CC) -c $(CFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) %%CODEBLOCK_1%%lt; -o $@

The result of this is that if you have defined the flags correctly, you can omit an explicit rule and rely instead on the implicit rule. In this particular Makefile, it means that you can entirely omit the rule for glad.o. As long as glad.c is in the current directory, and main.cpp is in the current directory, the built-in rules will understand how to create both glad.o using gcc and main.o using g++.

To expand this a bit, here's what happens when I run make -d to get it to emit more detailed debugging information:

Considering target file 'main.exe'.
    Considering target file 'main.o'.
     Looking for an implicit rule for 'main.o'.
     Trying pattern rule with stem 'main'.
     Trying implicit prerequisite 'main.c'.
     Trying pattern rule with stem 'main'.
     Trying implicit prerequisite 'main.cc'.
     Trying pattern rule with stem 'main'.
     Trying implicit prerequisite 'main.C'.
     Trying pattern rule with stem 'main'.
     Trying implicit prerequisite 'main.cpp'.
     Found an implicit rule for 'main.o'.
      Considering target file 'main.cpp'.

As you can see, after it has identified a needed target (main.o) it starts looking for implicit rules to create that target. It finds one eventually because main.cpp exists. To see the full list in order on your machine, create an empty subdirectory, navigate to it and execute make -d foo.o. Since foo.o won't exist (it's an empty subdirectory) it will attempt to find an implicit rule that will allow it to create that file and with the -d option, it will tell you all of the things it's trying. On my machine, that generates 734 lines of output, so there's really quite a number of implicit rules. There are rules to create object files from C and C++, but also from Fortran, Pascal, Modula, assembly language, and for trying to check out a .o file from various version control systems.

Add LIBRARIES to LDFLAGS

Your main rule (pardon the pun) does this:

$(CXX) $(LIBRARIES) -o main.exe $(objects) glad.o $(LINK_FLAGS)

There are a number of changes I'd make to that line, but one is to consolidate $(LIBRARIES) and $(LINK_FLAGS) into a single variable with a standard name, which is LDFLAGS.

Use predefined variables

Try to avoid repeating hard-coded names in the production rules. For example, the rule for main.exe could be much simplified to this:

$(CXX) -o $@ $^ $(LDFLAGS)

Add a clean psuedotarget

It's often useful (not least when testing makefiles!) to provide a clean psuedotarget to remove all of the files that were generated, providing a "clean slate" from which to start. It might be written like this:

.PHONY : clean
clean :
        -rm main.exe $(objects) glad.o

This also makes it less likely that you'll want to have the makefile itself as a dependency, which makes the set of rules cleaner. This would work even if the first line were omitted, unless there were actually a file named clean. To tell the makefile that it's not a real file, we use the line .PHONY : clean.

Add glad.o to objects

If you add glad.o to the objects list, you can simplify the rules.

Consider isolating TARGET

For Windows, executables typically end in .exe but not so for most other platforms. For that reason you could either have a specific variable for the executable extension or keep the target name in a variable:

TARGET = main.exe

Putting it all together

If we take all of these suggestio

StackExchange Code Review Q#78855, answer score: 8