SICP Exercise 1.3: Sum of squares of two largest numbers out of three

The exercise 1.3 of the book Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs asks the following:


Exercise 1.3. Define a procedure that takes three numbers as arguments and returns the sum of the squares of the two larger numbers.

My answer is this:

var sumSquareLargest = function (x, y, z) {
        var numbers = [x, y, z];
        numbers.sort();
        return numbers[1] * numbers[1] + numbers[2] * numbers[2];
    };

Am I doing unnecessary work here? How could I improve this answer, even if only stylistically-speaking?

Finding the minimum of three numbers is easier than sorting three numbers, and it doesn't require creating a temporary array.

This runs about 10 times faster.

var sumSquareNotMin = function(x, y, z) {
    var min = Math.min(x, y, z);
    return -min * min + x * x + y * y + z * z;
};

As @Corbin mentioned, floating-point arithmetic is tricky. I've arranged the negative term first, which should cope better with overflow. However, in extremely unusual cases (such as when dealing with a mix of tiny and huge numbers), the result could differ from the original.

StackExchange Code Review Q#86086, answer score: 6