Pythonic sieve of Erasthotones that saves results to file

I'd like to have some feedback on this sieve of erasthotones that I've wrote. It outputs all prime numbers up to n correctly (I've tested with the first 10k prime numbers).

Is this well written? Does it look good for python programmers?

I've made the math up to the sqrt of n + 1, which improved the performance a lot.

import time
import sys
from math import sqrt    

def notMarkedValue(n):
    """
    Returns True if parameter is a possible prime number, False otherwise
    """
    return n != -1

def sieve(val):
    """
    Sieve of Eratosthenes implementation. Finds all prime numbers up to n
    """
    primes = [x for x in range(2, val)]
    for n in range(2, int(sqrt(val)+1)):
        if notMarkedValue(n):
            for i in range(2, val):
                index = (i*n) - 2 # shift index down -2 because 0 and 1 are not in the list
                if index  1 else int(input('Find all primes up to: '))

def main():
    n = getMaxNumber()
    print("-- counting primes...")
    start = time.clock()
    primes = sieve(n)
    end = time.clock()
    print("-- calculated all prime numbers up to {0} in {1} seconds".format(n, (end - start)))
    print("-- saving to file \"output\"...")
    saveToFile(primes)

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

One thing that I've thought was about making def sieve() return a list(filter(notMarkedValue, primes)), so that I'd have a list that could be enumerated later, but I didn't as I thought it'd be a bit overkill.

Edit: Now that I'm thinking of it, I should have added to its docstring that it returns a filter object. :-)

First off, the general naming style in Python is snake_case for functions and variables, and PascalCase for classes. On the note of style, you should also have two blank lines between top-level functions/classes/code blocks.

Secondly, are you sure that you want to be using len( ... ), rather than len ( ... ) - 1, as you did here: if index < len(primes):? The len function "counts" the objects in the list starting at 1, not 0, which means if you're using it to get indexes, it'll be off by one.

Other than that, there's not much else that really needs to be improved here! Good job!

StackExchange Code Review Q#95807, answer score: 4