HiveBrain v1.2.0
Get Started
← Back to all entries
patternpythonMinor

MaxCounters solution

Submitted by: @import:stackexchange-codereview··
0
Viewed 0 times
maxcounterssolutionstackoverflow

Problem

I am doing this Codility problem


You are given N counters, initially set to 0, and you have two possible operations on them:



  • increase(X) − counter X is increased by 1,



  • max counter − all counters are set to the maximum value of any counter.





A non-empty zero-indexed array A of M integers is given. This array represents consecutive operations:



  • if A[K] = X, such that 1 ≤ X ≤ N, then operation K is increase(X),



  • if A[K] = N + 1 then operation K is max counter.




I have ended up with this code -

def solution(N, array):
    counters = [0]*N
    maximum = 0
    for a in array: # O(m) as array has m integers
        if a >=1 and a <= N:
            counters[a-1] += 1
            maximum = max(counters[a-1], maximum) 
        if a == N+1:
            counters = [maximum]*N
    return counters


I am failing two test cases because of timeout errors. I timed the function with array as [10]*100000 and \$N\$ as 9. It took 0.175681062359 seconds which is clearly not desirable. I do not understand where the time complexity increases. The for loop has \$O(M)\$ complexity because array has \$M\$ elements and even though max() has \$O(n)\$ complexity, that doesn't matter since I'm comparing just two elements. I looked at a solution by Andrei Simionescu and it looks awfully similar to mine -

def solution(n, arr):
    out = [0] * n
    m = 0
    last = 0
    for op in arr:
        op -= 1 
        if op == n:
            last = m
            continue
        out[op] = max(out[op], last) + 1
        m = max(m, out[op])
    for i in xrange(n):
        out[i] = max(out[i], last)
    return out


I timed the above code and it took just 0.0276817503901 seconds on the same input. What is it that I'm doing wrong?

Solution

if a == N+1: 
     counters = [maximum]*N #array initializer


Looks \$O(N)\$ to me, making your total time complexity \$O(Nm)\$ worst case. The other guy has 2 separate loops, one \$O(m)\$ the next \$O(n)\$, for a total time complexity of \$O(m+n)\$ or \$O(max(n,m))\$.

Take home message:

Ditch the \$O(N)\$ array initializer, it's not worth it. Use 2 separate passes, like the other guy did.

Code Snippets

if a == N+1: 
     counters = [maximum]*N #array initializer

Context

StackExchange Code Review Q#151574, answer score: 4

Revisions (0)

No revisions yet.